๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ก๐ฎ๐ ๐๐จ๐?
- Mark S. Railey
- Feb 10
- 5 min read
Updated: Feb 19
Disclaimer: As a theologian and Scholar, I do not endorse the conclusions of any particular Jewish or Christian denomination. (I am comfortable in the excluded middle.) The Bible/TNK often challenges our preconceived notions. This post may surprise some of my readers; but, I assure you, the results speak for themselves.
Some questions wonโt let you stay neutral. They demand an answer. One of the most important, and most controversial, is whether Yeshua is divine. If He is, then He is worthy of worship. If He is not, then no one should be wasting their time on Him. There is no middle ground.
Yet, for centuries, people have misunderstood what Scripture actually says. Some claim Yeshuaโs divinity was a later Christian invention, forced onto the text. Others say He never directly called Himself God, so the idea must be false. Others insist Judaism has never expected a divine Messiah. These objections sound compelling at firstโuntil you test them. Once you examine the Bible, Jewish sources, history, and logic, the evidence is overwhelming: ๐๐๐ฌ๐ก๐ฎ๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐ฑ๐๐๐ญ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ก๐จ ๐๐ ๐๐ฅ๐๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐.
๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ค๐ #๐: ๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ง๐๐ค๐ก ๐๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ ๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ค๐ฌ ๐จ๐ ๐ ๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐๐ก
Some argue that Judaism has always expected the Messiah to be only human. But that claim falls apart once you actually read the Tanakh. Over and over, the Hebrew Scriptures describe the coming Messiah in ways that no mere man could fulfill.
๐๐ฌ๐๐ข๐๐ก ๐:๐ is one of the clearest examples.
โ๐ญ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐... ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐พ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐ด๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ (๐ฌ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐๐๐๐), ๐ฌ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ญ๐๐๐๐๐ (๐จ๐๐ ๐จ๐ ), ๐ท๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ท๐๐๐๐.โ
The Hebrew title ๐ธ๐ ๐บ๐๐๐๐๐ means ๐๐ข๐ ๐ก๐ญ๐ฒ ๐๐จ๐, and one chapter later, Isaiah uses this exact phrase for God Himself (Isaiah 10:21). That means ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ก๐ข๐ฅ๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐๐ฌ๐๐ข๐๐ก ๐:๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ง ๐ ๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ข๐ญ๐ฅ๐. Some claim this refers to Hezekiah, but that makes no sense. Hezekiah was never called ๐๐๐โ๐ก๐ฆ ๐บ๐๐, nor did he establish ๐๐ง ๐๐ญ๐๐ซ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐ค๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐จ๐ฆ ๐จ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐๐๐. This prophecy is speaking of someone far greater than any human king.
Another undeniable passage is ๐๐๐ง๐ข๐๐ฅ ๐:๐๐-๐๐. Daniel sees a vision of a mysterious Son of Man who ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ฎ๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ ๐ก๐๐๐ฏ๐๐งโa phrase used only for Godโs presence. This ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ is given absolute power, eternal rule, andโmost strikinglyโ๐๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐ฌ๐ก๐ข๐ฉ๐๐ ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ง๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ (๐๐๐๐๐โ in Aramaic), a word used exclusively for worshiping God (Daniel 7:14).
This is not a normal king. No prophet or angel is ever given this level of worship. Yet, Yeshua directly applied this passage to Himself (Mark 14:61-62), and the Jewish leaders immediately accused Him of blasphemy. Why? Because they understood that He wasnโt just claiming to be the Messiahโ๐๐ ๐ฐ๐๐ฌ ๐๐ฅ๐๐ข๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐ง๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ.
Even more intriguing is the ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐ฅ ๐จ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐ (๐๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ก ๐๐๐๐) in the Tanakh. This mysterious figure appears throughout Scripture, speaking ๐๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ yet remaining ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐๐ญ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐๐จ๐.
โข ๐๐๐ง๐๐ฌ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐ โ Abraham meets three men, but one is called YHWH.
โข ๐๐ฑ๐จ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐ โ The Angel of the LORD appears in the burning bush, yet speaks as God.
โข ๐๐ฎ๐๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐๐ โ Samsonโs parents see the Angel of the LORD and exclaim, โWe have seen God!โ
This being is sent ๐๐ฒ God yet ๐ข๐ฌ God. This concept of a divine yet distinct figure lays the foundation for Yeshuaโs identity.
๐๐จ๐ซ๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง: The Tanakh does, in fact, describe a divine Messiah. The idea that Judaism has only ever expected a human Messiah is a medieval revision, not the original belief. See Maimonides, ๐๐๐ โ๐๐โ ๐๐๐๐โ, ๐ป๐๐๐โ๐๐ก ๐๐๐๐๐โ๐๐ ๐'๐๐๐๐โ๐๐๐๐ก (Laws of Kings and Wars), Chapter 11.
๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ค๐ #๐: ๐๐๐ฌ๐ก๐ฎ๐ ๐๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ ๐๐๐ข๐, "๐ ๐๐ฆ ๐๐จ๐"
One of the most common objections is that Yeshua never walked around saying, โ๐ผ ๐๐ ๐บ๐๐, ๐ค๐๐๐ โ๐๐ ๐๐.โ But this argument completely misunderstands how Jewish teachers spoke (that is, indirectly and with the use of parables).
If Yeshua had gone around making such a blunt claim, He would have been misunderstood as denying the Fatherโs existence. Instead, He made statements that ๐๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐๐ฐ๐ข๐ฌ๐ก ๐๐ฎ๐๐ข๐๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐๐ซ๐ฌ๐ญ๐จ๐จ๐โwhich is why they tried to stone Him multiple times.
โข ๐๐จ๐ก๐ง ๐:๐๐ โ โ๐ต๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ด๐๐๐โ๐๐ ๐ค๐๐ , ๐ผ ๐ด๐.โ The crowd immediately tried to stone Him because ๐๐ ๐ฐ๐๐ฌ ๐๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐จ๐โ๐ฌ ๐ง๐๐ฆ๐ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐๐ฑ๐จ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐:๐๐ to Himself.
โข ๐๐จ๐ก๐ง ๐๐:๐๐ โ โ๐ผ ๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐น๐๐กโ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐.โ The Jewish leaders again picked up stones and said, โ๐๐๐ข, ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐, ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ก๐ ๐๐ ๐บ๐๐.โ
โข ๐๐๐ซ๐ค ๐๐:๐๐-๐๐ โ When asked if He was the Messiah, Yeshua replied, โ๐ผ ๐๐,โ then quoted ๐๐๐ง๐ข๐๐ฅ ๐, the divine ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐. The high priest called it blasphemy.
If Yeshua was just claiming to be a great teacher or a human Messiah, why did His enemies react so violently? They knew exactly what He was claiming.
๐๐จ๐ซ๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง: Yeshua absolutely did claim divinity, but He did so in ways that fit His Jewish audience. The claim that He never said โ๐ผ ๐๐ ๐บ๐๐โ ignores how Jewish teachers communicated divine truths (see, for example, the ๐๐๐โ๐๐๐ก๐ ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ผ๐ โ๐๐๐๐ or ๐๐๐๐๐๐ โ ๐๐โ๐๐๐๐๐).
๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ค๐ #๐: ๐๐ฎ๐๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ฆ ๐๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ ๐๐ฑ๐ฉ๐๐๐ญ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐๐ก
Some argue that the idea of a divine Messiah is a Christian invention (See, for example, ๐โ๐ ๐๐ฆ๐กโ ๐๐ ๐บ๐๐ ๐ผ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ก๐, ed. by John Hick, or ๐โ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ถโ๐๐๐ ๐ก: ๐ ๐๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐ฟ๐๐ ๐ก ๐ฟ๐๐โ๐ก by Tom Harpur). But early Jewish sources say otherwise.
โข ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฌ (๐๐๐๐๐, "๐๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐ ๐๐จ๐" ๐๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฅ๐ฅ) โ This pre-Christian Jewish text describes a figure called ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐บ๐๐, proving that this concept existed in Jewish thought before Yeshua (4Q246).
โข ๐๐ข๐๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ก ๐๐๐ง๐๐ก๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ ๐จ๐ง ๐๐ฌ๐๐ข๐๐ก ๐๐:๐๐ โ States the Messiah will be โ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ก๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ ๐ด๐๐๐โ๐๐, ๐๐๐ ๐๐ , ๐๐๐ ๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ก๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ .โ
โข ๐๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐, ๐๐๐ง๐ก๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐ง ๐๐๐ โ Describes the Messiah sitting at Godโs right hand, a place of divine authority.
Even in the ๐๐ข๐๐๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ฌ, some Jewish texts still hinted at a supernatural Messiah. The ๐๐ฉ๐จ๐๐๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฉ๐ฌ๐ ๐จ๐ ๐๐๐ซ๐ฎ๐๐๐๐๐๐ฅ describes a Messiah who engages in heavenly battles. The ๐๐ข๐๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ก ๐๐๐ก๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ข๐ฆ (Psalm 21:6) says the Messiah will be greater than the angels. These ideas existed within Judaism but were later abandonedโlargely in reaction to Christianity.
๐๐จ๐ซ๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง: The idea of a divine Messiah is not foreign to Judaism. It was present in early Jewish thought but was later downplayed due to polemics against Christianity and the later 20th Century scholarly work in the Quest for the Historical Jesus (See, ๐ป๐๐ค ๐ฝ๐๐ ๐ข๐ ๐ต๐๐๐๐๐ ๐บ๐๐: ๐โ๐ ๐ธ๐ฅ๐๐๐ก๐๐ก๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ ๐ฝ๐๐ค๐๐ โ ๐๐๐๐๐โ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐บ๐๐๐๐๐๐, Bart D. Ehrman, and Geza Vermes, in ๐ถโ๐๐๐ ๐ก๐๐๐ ๐ต๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ : ๐น๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ง๐๐๐๐กโ ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐ด๐ท 30โ325).
๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ค๐ #๐: ๐๐ก๐ ๐๐ก๐๐ฆ๐ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฏ๐๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐๐ง๐, ๐๐จ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ก๐ฎ๐ ๐๐๐ง'๐ญ ๐๐ ๐๐จ๐
The ๐๐ก๐๐ฆ๐ (๐๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ง๐จ๐ฆ๐ฒ ๐:๐) declares that ๐บ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ (๐๐โ๐๐). Some argue this means God ๐๐๐ง๐ง๐จ๐ญ be complex. But ๐๐โ๐๐ ๐๐จ๐๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ mean absolute singularity.
โข ๐๐๐ง๐๐ฌ๐ข๐ฌ ๐:๐๐ โ โ๐โ๐ ๐ก๐ค๐ ๐ โ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ (๐๐โ๐๐) ๐๐๐๐ โ.โ
โข ๐๐ฎ๐ฆ๐๐๐ซ๐ฌ ๐๐:๐๐ โ โ๐โ๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ (๐๐โ๐๐) ๐๐๐ข๐ ๐ก๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ .โ
Clearly, ๐๐โ๐๐ can mean ๐ ๐ฎ๐ง๐ข๐๐ข๐๐ ๐จ๐ง๐๐ง๐๐ฌ๐ฌ, not an indivisible unit. The Hebrew word ๐ฆ๐๐โ๐๐ signifies an absolute singularity or uniqueness. The idea that God is both One and yet complex ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐๐ข๐ ๐ง ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ฎ๐๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ฆ.
๐๐จ๐ซ๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง: The Shema does not contradict Yeshuaโs divinity. It simply affirms that there is only one true God, which is exactly what Yeshua taught.
๐๐จ๐ฎ ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐๐๐ข๐๐!
The ๐๐๐ง๐๐ค๐ก ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐๐ฅ๐๐ข๐ฆ๐ฌ ๐ ๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐๐ก. The ๐๐๐ฐ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐จ๐ง๐๐ข๐ซ๐ฆ๐ฌ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ก๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐. Early Jewish sourcesโeven those written before Yeshuaโshow that the idea of a divine Messiah was already present.
The real question isnโt โ๐๐จ๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ข๐๐ฅ๐ ๐ญ๐๐๐๐ก ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ก๐ฎ๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐?โ It does. The real question is: ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ฏ๐ ๐ข๐ญ?

Kommentare