๐๐ก๐๐ง๐ค ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐๐ฌ๐ค๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ช๐ฎ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ:
- Mark S. Railey
- Dec 8, 2024
- 4 min read
๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐. ๐๐ฌ๐ค๐ฌ: ๐๐ก๐๐ญ ๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐๐ง๐๐ ๐๐จ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ ๐ก๐๐ฏ๐ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ข๐๐ฅ๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ?
Tina, let's start with the New Testament, where the concept of the Trinity is most clearly expressed. The clearest evidence comes from passages that present the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit as distinct yet united. Consider Matthew 28:19, where Yeshua commands His disciples to baptize โin the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.โ Notice the singular โnameโ (not names), implying unity while acknowledging distinction.

In John 1:1-14, we see the Word (Yeshua) described as being both with G-d and being G-d, a profound mystery of unity and distinction. Yeshua Himself says, โI and the Father are oneโ (John 10:30), affirming His oneness with the Father without collapsing their distinct identities. The Holy Spirit is likewise identified as G-d, as seen in Acts 5:3-4, where lying to the Holy Spirit is equated with lying to G-d.
The Hebrew Scriptures (Tanakh) offer shadows of this concept. Genesis 1:26 says, โLet Us make man in Our image,โ suggesting a plurality within G-dโs unity. The word echad in the Shema (Deut. 6:4) denotes a compound unity, as in the oneness of a cluster of grapes. Isaiah 9:6 calls the Messiah โMighty G-dโ (El Gibbor), revealing His divine nature. The Spirit of G-d is described as distinct yet integral to G-dโs work (e.g., Genesis 1:2; Isaiah 48:16).
These threads come together in Yeshua, who fulfills the roles of Creator, Redeemer, and Sustainer as one with the Father and Spirit. The Trinity, while beyond full human comprehension, is a consistent revelation of G-dโs nature in Scripture.
๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐ ๐. ๐๐ฌ๐ค๐ฌ: ๐๐ก๐๐ญ ๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐๐ง๐๐ ๐๐จ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ ๐ก๐๐ฏ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ฆ๐ข๐ญ๐ญ๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฅ ๐จ๐ง ๐๐ก๐๐๐๐๐ญ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ญ๐ญ๐๐ง๐ ๐ ๐ฌ๐๐ซ๐ฏ๐ข๐๐? ๐๐ซ๐๐งโ๐ญ ๐ฌ๐ฒ๐ง๐๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ฌ ๐ ๐๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ง ๐๐ง๐ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ง๐๐ค๐ก?
David, Leviticus 23:3 calls for a โholy convocationโ (mikra kodesh) every Shabbat. While it doesnโt specify synagogues, the command assumes a gathering, as convocation means an assembly. In Yeshuaโs day, synagogues were the established places for these gatherings. Luke 4:16 describes Yeshuaโs regular practice of attending synagogue on Shabbat, affirming the validity of this tradition. The apostles continued this practice, teaching in synagogues (Acts 17:2).
Travel on Shabbat is not explicitly prohibited in the Torah. The restriction in Exodus 16:29 relates specifically to gathering manna, not general movement. The creation of synagogues and communal worship outside the Temple reflects a legitimate adaptation for maintaining G-dโs commands in the diaspora.
The argument against travel relies on silence rather than explicit command. If Yeshua, who upheld the Torah perfectly, traveled to synagogues on Shabbat, then it follows that this practice aligns with G-dโs intent for Shabbat observance.
๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐๐ฅ ๐. ๐๐ฌ๐ค๐ฌ: ๐๐ ๐๐๐ซ ๐๐จ๐ฌ๐ก๐๐ฏ ๐๐จ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ซ๐๐๐จ๐ ๐ง๐ข๐ณ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฏ๐๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐๐ข๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐-๐โ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ฒ ๐๐ซ๐ ๐๐ข๐ญ๐ก๐๐ซ ๐ข๐๐จ๐ฅ๐๐ญ๐ซ๐ฒ ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฌ๐๐ฆ๐ข-๐ข๐๐จ๐ฅ๐๐ญ๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ.
Russel, your concern is valid, as Israel has a history of falling into idolatry, notably with the Golden Calf. However, intermediaries are not inherently idolatrous; they are part of G-dโs design for approaching Him. The High Priest interceded for Israel on Yom Kippur, entering the Holy of Holies with the blood of atonement (Leviticus 16). The scapegoat bore the sins of the people and was sent away (Lev. 16:21-22). Angels also serve as intermediaries, delivering messages and executing G-dโs will (e.g., Genesis 19; Daniel 10).
Prayer itself is a form of mediation, as we often rely on the words of the Psalms or liturgical prayers crafted by others. Even the rabbinic system relies on the authority of teachers and sages to mediate G-dโs Torah to the people.
The ultimate intermediary is Yeshua, described as the โone mediator between G-d and mankindโ (1 Timothy 2:5). Far from idolatry, Yeshuaโs mediation fulfills the Torahโs pattern. G-d is both transcendent and immanentโHe desires closeness with His people, and Yeshua bridges that gap, embodying G-dโs presence among us (John 1:14).
๐๐ก๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ ๐. ๐๐ฌ๐ค๐ฌ: ๐๐ฌ๐งโ๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ซ๐ ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐๐ก ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐๐จ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐, ๐ฌ๐จ ๐๐จ๐ญ๐ก ๐๐๐ฐ๐ฌ ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐ฅ๐๐ฌ ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ฌ๐๐ฏ๐๐ ๐๐ฒ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ก๐ฎ๐ ๐จ๐ง๐ฅ๐ฒ? ๐๐ฌ๐งโ๐ญ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ฐ๐จ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐๐ก๐ฌ ๐ญ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ฆ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐ญ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฌ๐๐ฒ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ซ๐ ๐๐ซ๐ ๐จ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ซ ๐ฐ๐๐ฒ๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ก๐๐๐ฏ๐๐ง ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ก๐ฎ๐?
Chris, youโre absolutely right that there is One Torah (Deuteronomy 4:8), but Torah itself accommodates different roles and responsibilities. For example, the High Priest alone entered the Holy of Holies, while the Levites had distinct duties, and ordinary Israelites had yet another role. Similarly, Gentiles living among Israel followed certain commands (Leviticus 17-18) but were not bound to all the laws of Israel, like dietary restrictions on animals that died naturally (Deut. 14:21).
Salvation comes through Yeshua alone (Acts 4:12), but Torahโs application varies. Paul explains in Romans 11 that Gentiles are grafted into Israelโs olive tree. They share in its blessings but retain their identity as wild branches. This diversity reflects G-dโs design: โMy house will be called a house of prayer for all nationsโ (Isaiah 56:7).
The Torah acknowledges different statuses without diminishing anyoneโs value or salvation. Itโs One Torah for all people, applied uniquely according to G-dโs purposes for Israel and the nations.
Thank you for all of the questions. I will answer some with individual posts (they require more space) and will try to answer more questions as time allows. I am receiving questions from Christians, Jews, Ger Toshav, folks that do not self-identify, the excluded middle, etc. Please keep them coming.
If you found this format helpful, give a thumbs up and share this post.
B"H
Comments