top of page
Search

๐“๐ก๐ž ๐„๐š๐ซ๐ฅ๐ข๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐ž๐ฅ๐ข๐ž๐ฏ๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐ž๐ญ ๐จ๐ง ๐’๐ฎ๐ง๐๐š๐ฒ

  • Writer: Mark S. Railey
    Mark S. Railey
  • Dec 13, 2024
  • 5 min read

The Didache, meaning "Teaching of the Twelve Apostles," gives us an extraordinary glimpse into the earliest days of Yeshuaโ€™s followers. Written sometime between 50โ€“120 CE, it likely emerged during the same era as Paulโ€™s letters and the Gospel of Matthew. In this pivotal period, the young Messianic movement was still deeply rooted in its Jewish heritage while grappling with the revolutionary implications of Yeshuaโ€™s resurrection.


ree

The Didache is neither lofty theology nor storytelling. Instead, itโ€™s a simple yet profound guide for daily living, communal worship, and a life oriented toward G-d's kingdom. It breathes the air of a people who are trying to walk faithfully as disciples of the risen Messiah while standing on the foundation of Torah.


One of its most intriguing instructions is the command to gather on the "Lordโ€™s Day" (๐พ๐‘ฆ๐‘Ÿ๐‘–๐‘Ž๐‘˜๐‘’ โ„Ž๐‘’๐‘š๐‘’๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ž). The text says:


"๐‘‚๐‘› ๐‘กโ„Ž๐‘’ ๐ฟ๐‘œ๐‘Ÿ๐‘‘โ€™๐‘  ๐ท๐‘Ž๐‘ฆ, ๐‘๐‘œ๐‘š๐‘’ ๐‘ก๐‘œ๐‘”๐‘’๐‘กโ„Ž๐‘’๐‘Ÿ, ๐‘๐‘Ÿ๐‘’๐‘Ž๐‘˜ ๐‘๐‘Ÿ๐‘’๐‘Ž๐‘‘, ๐‘Ž๐‘›๐‘‘ ๐‘”๐‘–๐‘ฃ๐‘’ ๐‘กโ„Ž๐‘Ž๐‘›๐‘˜๐‘  ๐‘Ž๐‘“๐‘ก๐‘’๐‘Ÿ ๐‘๐‘œ๐‘›๐‘“๐‘’๐‘ ๐‘ ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘” ๐‘ฆ๐‘œ๐‘ข๐‘Ÿ ๐‘ ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ , ๐‘ ๐‘œ ๐‘ฆ๐‘œ๐‘ข๐‘Ÿ ๐‘ ๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘Ÿ๐‘–๐‘“๐‘–๐‘๐‘’ ๐‘ค๐‘–๐‘™๐‘™ ๐‘๐‘’ ๐‘๐‘ข๐‘Ÿ๐‘’."


Here, we see a thread connecting the Didache to the apostolic writings. Paul tells the Corinthians to set aside offerings on the first day of the week (1 Corinthians 16:2), and Acts describes believers breaking bread together on this same day (Acts 20:7). These practices commemorate Yeshuaโ€™s resurrection, which took place at the dawn of the first day, transforming it into a day of hope and renewal. Importantly, this custom emerged naturally among early Jewish-Christians, who carried with them the rhythms of the Torah while embracing the new life brought by Messiah. It is an undeniable fact of history: Sunday worship did not originate with Constantine. It was a first-century reality, woven into the spiritual DNA of those who had encountered the risen Messiah.


๐“๐ก๐ž ๐‰๐ž๐ฐ๐ข๐ฌ๐ก-๐‚๐ก๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐š๐ง ๐‚๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ฑ๐ญ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ƒ๐ข๐๐š๐œ๐ก๐ž


The Didache doesnโ€™t belong to a world divorced from Judaism; it breathes its essence. Its ethical teachings, called the "Two Ways" (the way of life and the way of death), mirror the blessings and curses of Deuteronomy (Deut. 30:19). Its instructions on fasting, prayer, and communal life echo Jewish traditions but bear the distinctive mark of Yeshuaโ€™s teachings. For instance, the Didacheโ€™s version of the Lordโ€™s Prayer is recited three times daily, paralleling the Jewish tradition of praying at morning, afternoon, and evening. These echoes of Jewish practice remind us that the earliest believers did not abandon their roots but reinterpreted them in the light of Yeshua's life, death, and resurrection.


In this way, the Didache stands shoulder-to-shoulder with Paulโ€™s letters and Matthewโ€™s Gospel. Paul, writing in the same period, wrestled with questions about the Torahโ€™s role in a community that now included Gentiles. Matthew, meanwhile, presented Yeshua as the fulfillment of Torah, emphasizing His Jewish identity and the global scope of His mission. The Didache reflects a community navigating this same tensionโ€”remaining faithful to Torah while embracing a new understanding of G-d's kingdom.


๐€ ๐ƒ๐ž๐ฏ๐ž๐ฅ๐จ๐ฉ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐“๐ก๐ž๐จ๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฒ


The Didache offers a snapshot of a theology and practice still in the process of becoming. Sunday worship, as it appears in the text, was not a replacement for the Sabbath but a supplementary act of devotion, a celebration of Yeshua's victory over death. It reveals the organic development of Christian life, rooted in its Jewish beginnings and unfolding through the Spiritโ€™s leading. By the time of the Nicene Council in 325 CE, the church had grown and changed, shaped by theological debates, cultural contexts, and the challenge of defining orthodoxy. Yet, the seeds of this growth were already present in documents like the Didache, Paulโ€™s epistles, and the Gospels.


The Didache invites us to step into a world where faith was fresh and practices were forming. It reminds us that the Christian story is not one of sudden rupture but of gradual transformation. As the community of Yeshuaโ€™s followers grew, so too did their understanding of His teachings and their place in G-dโ€™s plan. The journey from the Didache to Nicene Christianity is one of evolution, not inventionโ€”a movement guided by the Spirit through the ebbs and flows of history.


๐’๐ฎ๐ง๐๐š๐ฒ ๐–๐จ๐ซ๐ฌ๐ก๐ข๐ฉ: ๐€ ๐…๐ข๐ซ๐ฌ๐ญ-๐‚๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฒ ๐‘๐ž๐š๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ


The Didache firmly places Sunday worship within the first century, as a practice born out of the resurrection itself. The apostles and early believers didnโ€™t need Constantine to declare the significance of the first day; they already knew it was the day their Messiah conquered death. Far from being a later addition, the "Lordโ€™s Day" was woven into the fabric of their worship and their hope. This simple text, alongside the New Testament, tells the story of a people finding their way in a world forever changed by Yeshuaโ€™s triumph. It invites us to see the continuity between the Torah, Yeshua, and the early church, as G-dโ€™s plan unfolded through faithful lives, generation by generation.


๐‰๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ญ๐จ ๐›๐ž ๐œ๐ฅ๐ž๐š๐ซ: Just because the "Lord's Day" is Sunday does not negate the holiness of Shabbat. It is very likely the early Jewish (and Gentile "grafted in") believers kept Shabbat and met on the Lord's Day as well. Those who still hold that Constantine turned Sunday into the Lord's Day, need to reconsider their belief based upon historical evidence to the contrary.


The Didacheโ€™s affirmation of gatherings on the Lordโ€™s Day does not negate the sanctity of Shabbat but enriches early believersโ€™ worship. Scriptural evidence unmistakably points to Yeshuaโ€™s resurrection on the first day of the week, a cornerstone of faith that infused this day with profound significance (Matthew 28:1; Mark 16:2). Historical writings from Ignatius, Barnabas, and Justin Martyr affirm that the Lordโ€™s Day was not a replacement for Shabbat but a commemoration of Yeshuaโ€™s victory over death. This dual rhythm of Shabbat observance and first-day gatherings reflects the early communityโ€™s commitment to honoring both creation and redemption.


Critics who argue that Sunday gatherings stem from Constantineโ€™s pagan influence overlook pre-Constantine sources like the Didache, which predates Roman decrees by centuries. The Didacheโ€™s instruction to โ€œgather on the Lordโ€™s Dayโ€, alongside Acts 20:7 and 1 Corinthians 16:2, illustrates a pattern of first-day gatherings rooted in resurrection theology, not syncretism. Claims that these gatherings were purely practical or tied to Havdalah traditions miss their spiritual and theological significance, as early believers understood the first day as a celebration of new creation and the Messiahโ€™s triumph.


Far from diminishing Shabbatโ€™s importance, the Lordโ€™s Day gatherings expanded the scope of worship for early believers, bridging Jewish tradition with the transformative reality of the resurrection. This practice of observing Shabbat while also gathering on the first day demonstrates the inclusivity and theological depth of the early ekklesia. By embracing both creation and resurrection, we can honor the full narrative of G-dโ€™s redemptive work, fostering unity rather than division in worship.


B"H

ย 
ย 
ย 

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page