๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ซ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐๐ญ ๐จ๐ง ๐๐ฎ๐ง๐๐๐ฒ
- Mark S. Railey

- Dec 13, 2024
- 5 min read
The Didache, meaning "Teaching of the Twelve Apostles," gives us an extraordinary glimpse into the earliest days of Yeshuaโs followers. Written sometime between 50โ120 CE, it likely emerged during the same era as Paulโs letters and the Gospel of Matthew. In this pivotal period, the young Messianic movement was still deeply rooted in its Jewish heritage while grappling with the revolutionary implications of Yeshuaโs resurrection.

The Didache is neither lofty theology nor storytelling. Instead, itโs a simple yet profound guide for daily living, communal worship, and a life oriented toward G-d's kingdom. It breathes the air of a people who are trying to walk faithfully as disciples of the risen Messiah while standing on the foundation of Torah.
One of its most intriguing instructions is the command to gather on the "Lordโs Day" (๐พ๐ฆ๐๐๐๐๐ โ๐๐๐๐๐). The text says:
"๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐ฟ๐๐๐โ๐ ๐ท๐๐ฆ, ๐๐๐๐ ๐ก๐๐๐๐กโ๐๐, ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ฃ๐ ๐กโ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ก๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ข๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ , ๐ ๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ข๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ค๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ข๐๐."
Here, we see a thread connecting the Didache to the apostolic writings. Paul tells the Corinthians to set aside offerings on the first day of the week (1 Corinthians 16:2), and Acts describes believers breaking bread together on this same day (Acts 20:7). These practices commemorate Yeshuaโs resurrection, which took place at the dawn of the first day, transforming it into a day of hope and renewal. Importantly, this custom emerged naturally among early Jewish-Christians, who carried with them the rhythms of the Torah while embracing the new life brought by Messiah. It is an undeniable fact of history: Sunday worship did not originate with Constantine. It was a first-century reality, woven into the spiritual DNA of those who had encountered the risen Messiah.
๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ฐ๐ข๐ฌ๐ก-๐๐ก๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐๐ง ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐๐ฑ๐ญ ๐จ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ข๐๐๐๐ก๐
The Didache doesnโt belong to a world divorced from Judaism; it breathes its essence. Its ethical teachings, called the "Two Ways" (the way of life and the way of death), mirror the blessings and curses of Deuteronomy (Deut. 30:19). Its instructions on fasting, prayer, and communal life echo Jewish traditions but bear the distinctive mark of Yeshuaโs teachings. For instance, the Didacheโs version of the Lordโs Prayer is recited three times daily, paralleling the Jewish tradition of praying at morning, afternoon, and evening. These echoes of Jewish practice remind us that the earliest believers did not abandon their roots but reinterpreted them in the light of Yeshua's life, death, and resurrection.
In this way, the Didache stands shoulder-to-shoulder with Paulโs letters and Matthewโs Gospel. Paul, writing in the same period, wrestled with questions about the Torahโs role in a community that now included Gentiles. Matthew, meanwhile, presented Yeshua as the fulfillment of Torah, emphasizing His Jewish identity and the global scope of His mission. The Didache reflects a community navigating this same tensionโremaining faithful to Torah while embracing a new understanding of G-d's kingdom.
๐ ๐๐๐ฏ๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ฉ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ก๐๐จ๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฒ
The Didache offers a snapshot of a theology and practice still in the process of becoming. Sunday worship, as it appears in the text, was not a replacement for the Sabbath but a supplementary act of devotion, a celebration of Yeshua's victory over death. It reveals the organic development of Christian life, rooted in its Jewish beginnings and unfolding through the Spiritโs leading. By the time of the Nicene Council in 325 CE, the church had grown and changed, shaped by theological debates, cultural contexts, and the challenge of defining orthodoxy. Yet, the seeds of this growth were already present in documents like the Didache, Paulโs epistles, and the Gospels.
The Didache invites us to step into a world where faith was fresh and practices were forming. It reminds us that the Christian story is not one of sudden rupture but of gradual transformation. As the community of Yeshuaโs followers grew, so too did their understanding of His teachings and their place in G-dโs plan. The journey from the Didache to Nicene Christianity is one of evolution, not inventionโa movement guided by the Spirit through the ebbs and flows of history.
๐๐ฎ๐ง๐๐๐ฒ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฌ๐ก๐ข๐ฉ: ๐ ๐ ๐ข๐ซ๐ฌ๐ญ-๐๐๐ง๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฒ ๐๐๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ
The Didache firmly places Sunday worship within the first century, as a practice born out of the resurrection itself. The apostles and early believers didnโt need Constantine to declare the significance of the first day; they already knew it was the day their Messiah conquered death. Far from being a later addition, the "Lordโs Day" was woven into the fabric of their worship and their hope. This simple text, alongside the New Testament, tells the story of a people finding their way in a world forever changed by Yeshuaโs triumph. It invites us to see the continuity between the Torah, Yeshua, and the early church, as G-dโs plan unfolded through faithful lives, generation by generation.
๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ซ: Just because the "Lord's Day" is Sunday does not negate the holiness of Shabbat. It is very likely the early Jewish (and Gentile "grafted in") believers kept Shabbat and met on the Lord's Day as well. Those who still hold that Constantine turned Sunday into the Lord's Day, need to reconsider their belief based upon historical evidence to the contrary.
The Didacheโs affirmation of gatherings on the Lordโs Day does not negate the sanctity of Shabbat but enriches early believersโ worship. Scriptural evidence unmistakably points to Yeshuaโs resurrection on the first day of the week, a cornerstone of faith that infused this day with profound significance (Matthew 28:1; Mark 16:2). Historical writings from Ignatius, Barnabas, and Justin Martyr affirm that the Lordโs Day was not a replacement for Shabbat but a commemoration of Yeshuaโs victory over death. This dual rhythm of Shabbat observance and first-day gatherings reflects the early communityโs commitment to honoring both creation and redemption.
Critics who argue that Sunday gatherings stem from Constantineโs pagan influence overlook pre-Constantine sources like the Didache, which predates Roman decrees by centuries. The Didacheโs instruction to โgather on the Lordโs Dayโ, alongside Acts 20:7 and 1 Corinthians 16:2, illustrates a pattern of first-day gatherings rooted in resurrection theology, not syncretism. Claims that these gatherings were purely practical or tied to Havdalah traditions miss their spiritual and theological significance, as early believers understood the first day as a celebration of new creation and the Messiahโs triumph.
Far from diminishing Shabbatโs importance, the Lordโs Day gatherings expanded the scope of worship for early believers, bridging Jewish tradition with the transformative reality of the resurrection. This practice of observing Shabbat while also gathering on the first day demonstrates the inclusivity and theological depth of the early ekklesia. By embracing both creation and resurrection, we can honor the full narrative of G-dโs redemptive work, fostering unity rather than division in worship.
B"H



Comments